The Inflexahex Model in ACT: Committed Action vs Persistent Inaction, Impulsivity, or Avoidance

Daniel J. Moran, Ph.D.

MidAmerican Psychological Institute
Pickslyde Consulting

Key Points

  1. The lack of committed action is the area of most presenting problems.
  2. During case conceptualization, be on the lookout for inaction, impulsivity, and avoidance.
  3. Keep in mind the usefulness of empirically supported treatments while doing case formulation.
lock-icon

To unlock this video you need to get Demystifying ACT: A Practical Guide for Therapists course.

ACT Online Training

Learn how to apply the ACT framework in your practice effectively.

Earn 4.75 CE Credits

$197

Transcript

The Inflexahex Model in ACT: Committed Action vs Persistent Inaction, Impulsivity, or Avoidance

In this training for Acceptance and Commitment Therapy case conceptualization, we’ll look at the converse relationship between committed action and persistent inaction, impulsivity or avoidance.

The Inflexahex Model in ACT: Committed Action vs Persistent Inaction, Impulsivity, or Avoidance

In many ways, this might be the problematic domain that is most obvious to clients and influences them to seek help. This domain usually includes the obvious problems other people can see too. Now, we’re talking about the so-called symptoms that are often measured in psychopathology studies and are addressed in the empirically supported treatments.

The Inflexahex Model in ACT: Committed Action vs Persistent Inaction, Impulsivity, or Avoidance

The clinical question in this domain might sound like, what is the client doing too much of, too little of or doing in the inappropriate context?

Unlock Demystifying ACT: A Practical Guide for Therapists course.

Learn More

Already have an account? Sign in

Download These Materials

Unlock Demystifying ACT: A Practical Guide for Therapists course.

Learn More

Already have an account? Sign in